|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE-
TAKING CARBON OUT OF THE ENERGY EQUATION
Part 3 of a series of 3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * March 8, 2001* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
The energy sources that have been used by mankind since the dawn
of history have involved the release of carbon atoms. In the Stone
Age, man used wood fires as his energy source to cook his food and
warm himself. Wood contains a ten to one ratio of carbon to hydrogen.
With the beginning
of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century, man made the switch
to coal as the energy source. Coal was plentiful and more easily
transported. It was also more energy dense, containing only two
molecules of carbon for every molecule of hydrogen.
The automotive
revolution brought another new fuel, petroleum. Oil had an even
higher energy density. It had only one molecule of carbon for every
two of hydrogen. Oil was also more easily transported and produced
less soot. By 1960, oil had surpassed coal as the world's principal
fuel source.
At the beginning
of the 21st century, yet another fuel has begun to rival oil as
an energy source, natural gas. It is the cleanest of the fossil
fuels with only one unit of carbon for every four units of hydrogen.
Throughout
history, mankind has been steadily decarbonizing his energy sources
to capitalize on the hydrogen and keep the energy value, while lessening
the carbon emissions.
For nearly
all of human history the emphasis has been on producing the energy
without regard to the effect that the release of the carbon was
having on the global ecosystem. However, the past century's discovery
of carbon's role in changing Earth's climate and the possible risks
this represents, has changed the way we have come to view how we
consume energy.
Since 1751,
more than 271 billion tons of carbon have been added to the atmosphere
through the burning of fossil fuels. The clear consequence of this
addition is a rise in carbon dioxide, the principal "greenhouse
gas" that is linked to the entire concept of global warming.
The obvious
question that can be reasonably asked is why not eliminate carbon
from the fuel equation entirely and go directly to pure hydrogen
as the fuel? In some ways this transformation is already underway.
Hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, is commonly
used to fuel the space shuttle. It can be transported by pipeline
and stored in either liquid or gaseous forms. Even though it currently
costs more to produce hydrogen than petroleum, the idea of hydrogen
becoming the major carrier of energy is being given a great boost
by the development of the fuel cell.
The U.S. National
Renewable Energy Laboratory released a report last year that concluded,
"there are no technical showstoppers to implementing a near-term
hydrogen fuel infrastructure for direct hydrogen fuel cell vehicles."
With the ratification
by California of a requirement that 2% of new cars sold in the state
be zero-emission by 2002, fuel cells for automotive use are nearing
the market. Daimler-Chrysler has committed $1.5 billion to fuel
cell production over the next several years and will sell 20-30
of its fuel cell buses in Europe by 2002. It plans to mass-produce
100,000 fuel cell, hydrogen powered cars by 2004. Toyota and Honda
will begin marketing fuel cell cars in 2003.
In their 1999
book The Long Boom, former Shell executive Peter Schwartz and his
colleagues assert that fuel cells will replace the internal combustion
engine within two decades, and "by 2050 the world is running
on hydrogen, or close enough to call it the Hydrogen Age."
The technology
currently exists to refit today's internal combustion engine from
gasoline to hydrogen directly. Unfortunately, the infrastructure
to deliver supplies of hydrogen to the corner gas station is still
not ready for implementation. It is feasible, however. Marc Jenson
and Marc Ross of the University of Michigan estimate that building
10,000 such stations, covering 10-15% of U.S. filling stations,
would be sufficient incentive to motivate auto-makers to begin mass
production of direct hydrogen vehicles. An investment of $3 to 15
billion dollars would be needed in order to achieve this goal.
After initially
supplementing the petroleum economy, a hydrogen economy is inevitable.
Environmental considerations are demanding it, and practical applications
are putting it within the reach of the consumer. More information
to the public is needed to help bring understanding and a greater
will for early adoption of the process.
--Phil Walker
For information on how you can learn more, get involved and take
part, contact Hydrogen Now!, the international non-profit organization
dedicated to public information on the Hydrogen Economy. www.hydrogennow.org,
or call 866-GO-H2-NOW.
|