|
|

What Can We Learn from
the Hindenburg Disaster?
The explosion of the luxury airship Hindenburg
at Lakehurst, NJ, on May 6, 1937, serves as one of the most spectacular
moments recorded by the media. Until very recently, it has aided in paralyzing
the development of widespread hydrogen use as a fuel, due to concerns for
safety (and viewing the fiery picture above, understandably so). But knowing
the actual nature of the Hindenburg disaster, as well as knowing the behavior
of hydrogen allows us to dispel this stigma associated with hydrogen.
The Facts on the Hindenburg Disaster:
1. The bags of hydrogen that provided
the lifting force for the Hindenburg were NOT the main contributor to the
fire. The surface of the ship was coated with a combination of dark iron
oxide and reflective aluminum paint. These components are extremely flammable
and burn at a tremendously energetic rate once ignited. The skin of the
airship was ignited by electrical discharge from the clouds while docking
during an electrical storm. This reaction has been proven chemically for
years, and was demonstrated with actual remnants of the Hindenburg sixty
years later, which burned as vigorously as on the day of the disaster.
2. The hydrogen burned quickly, safely,
above the occupants. When the escaping hydrogen was ignited by the burning
skin of the airship, it burned far above the airship, and was completely
consumed within 60 seconds of the ignition. During this period of time,
the airship descended to the ground from the 150-foot docking tower.
3. Almost all deaths were caused by jumping
or falling from the airship. Of the 35 deaths from the disaster, 33 were
caused by jumping or falling. Only two deaths were caused by burning, and
it is likely that those two were from proximity to the burning skin of
the airship, or from the stores of diesel fuel that were ignited by the
covering. Whereas the hydrogen burned within one minute of ignition, the
diesel fires burned for up to ten hours after the ignition.
4. The Hindenburg would have burned if
it had been filled with inert helium gas. Even if the Hindenburg had not
been lifted by hydrogen, the ignition of the covering would still have
happened, and would then have set ablaze the diesel stores, resulting in
the same disaster.
5. The main cause of the disaster was
pilot error. The only way to prevent the disaster would have been if the
pilot had chosen to land in better conditions elsewhere, which was very
feasible, considering he had had enough fuel remaining to reach all the
way to California.
The Nature of Hydrogen:
-
Hydrogen is less flammable than gasoline.
The self-ignition temperature of hydrogen is 550 degrees Celsius. Gasoline
varies from 228-501 degrees Celsius, depending on the grade. When the Hindenburg
burned, it took some time before the hydrogen bags were ignited.
-
Hydrogen disperses quickly. Being the
lightest element (fifteen times lighter than air), hydrogen rises and spreads
out quickly in the atmosphere. So when a leak occurs, the hydrogen gas
quickly becomes so sparse that it cannot burn. Even when ignited, hydrogen
burns upward, and is quickly consumed, as shown in the Hindenburg picture.
By contrast, materials such as gasoline and diesel vapors, as well as natural
gas are heavier than air, and will not disperse, remaining a flammable
threat for much longer.
-
Hydrogen is non-toxic. Hydrogen is a non-toxic,
naturally-occurring element in the atmosphere. By comparison, all petroleum
fuels are asphyxiants, and are poisonous to humans.
-
Hydrogen combustion produces only water. When
pure hydrogen is burned in pure oxygen, only pure water is produced. Granted,
that’s an ideal scenario, which doesn’t occur outside of laboratories and
the space shuttle. In any case, when a hydrogen engine burns, it actually
cleans the ambient air, by completing combustion of the unburned hydrocarbons
that surround us. Compared with the toxic compounds (carbon monoxide, nitrogen
oxides, and hydrogen sulfide) produced by petroleum fuels, the products
of hydrogen burning are much safer.
-
Hydrogen can be stored safely. Tanks currently
in use for storage of compressed hydrogen (similar to compressed natural
gas tanks) have survived intact through testing by various means, including
being shot with six rounds from a .357 magnum, detonating a stick of dynamite
next to them, and subjecting them to fire at 1500 degrees F. Clearly, a
typical gasoline tank wouldn’t survive a single one of these tests.
What Have We Learned?
No fuel we currently use or have yet to
develop will be totally without hazards, through all the processes of production,
transportation, and consumption, just as no kitchen knife can be used without
risk to the chef. Hydrogen has long been considered close to ideal as a
fuel due to its abundance, non-toxic characteristics, and international
availability. We must recognize that each of us has learned to use knives
safely, and do so daily. As long as we use wisdom in our methods of production,
storage, and use of hydrogen, we’ll enjoy the same safety we have had with
petroleum fuels, with the additional benefit of fewer health hazards when
leaks do occur.
Sources
The following sources were used for this
article:
Research by Addison Bain, NASA Investigator
into the Hindenburg disaster.
McAlister, Roy. The Philosopher Mechanic.
Cox, Jack. "Will Hydrogen Bomb?" The Denver
Post. April 5, 2000.
Participate NOW! |

|